On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 00:10, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> 2011/6/8 Moritz Muehlenhoff :
> ...
>> Why is kolab-cyrus-imapd a separate source package? Can we fix it for Wheezy
>> to be built from a unified source package, i.e. a separate build target which
>> applies the seven Kolab patches?
>
> Yes, th
2011/6/8 Moritz Muehlenhoff :
...
> Why is kolab-cyrus-imapd a separate source package? Can we fix it for Wheezy
> to be built from a unified source package, i.e. a separate build target which
> applies the seven Kolab patches?
Yes, this is the way to go.
Those 7 patches are not synced with upstr
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 11:30:03PM +0200, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> 2011/6/5 Ondřej Surý :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have just realized that the same STARTTLS bug affect
> > kolab-cyrus-imapd as well.
> >
> > Ccing Security team, so they can keep track of the security vulnerability.
> >
> > You can find the
2011/6/5 Mathieu Parent :
> 2011/6/5 Ondřej Surý :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just realized that the same STARTTLS bug affect
>> kolab-cyrus-imapd as well.
>>
>> Ccing Security team, so they can keep track of the security vulnerability.
>>
>> You can find the patch in pkg-cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd-2.2 git
>
2011/6/5 Ondřej Surý :
> Hi,
>
> I have just realized that the same STARTTLS bug affect
> kolab-cyrus-imapd as well.
>
> Ccing Security team, so they can keep track of the security vulnerability.
>
> You can find the patch in pkg-cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd-2.2 git
> repository (on alioth) or in cyrus-
Hi,
I have just realized that the same STARTTLS bug affect
kolab-cyrus-imapd as well.
Ccing Security team, so they can keep track of the security vulnerability.
You can find the patch in pkg-cyrus-imapd/cyrus-imapd-2.2 git
repository (on alioth) or in cyrus-imapd-2.2 package sources.
I would su
6 matches
Mail list logo
