Bug#629067: [DRE-maint] Bug#629067: libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2011-12-13 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 13/12/2011 09:33, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Ok, I'll prepare the rails fix. I was still living in the world where redmine > was the culprit. My mistake ! It's really the security patch that caused the problem by using the non-existent html_safe method. A fix is proposed in this very bug report. We s

Bug#629067: [DRE-maint] Bug#629067: libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2011-12-13 Thread Ondřej Surý
Ok, I'll prepare the rails fix. I was still living in the world where redmine was the culprit. O. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:18, Jérémy Lal wrote: > On 10/12/2011 21:44, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10.12.2011 13:39, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> >>> i just forgot about that, and will propose a d

Bug#629067: [DRE-maint] Bug#629067: libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2011-12-13 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 10/12/2011 21:44, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi, > > On 10.12.2011 13:39, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> i just forgot about that, and will propose a debdiff tomorrow >> to the security team. >> Unless there's a more appropriate way of dealing with the upload ? > > it could be done via a stable upload in

Bug#629067: [DRE-maint] Bug#629067: libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2011-12-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, On 10.12.2011 13:39, Jérémy Lal wrote: > i just forgot about that, and will propose a debdiff tomorrow > to the security team. > Unless there's a more appropriate way of dealing with the upload ? it could be done via a stable upload in the next point release, also. But as the last point rele

Bug#629067: [DRE-maint] Bug#629067: libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2011-12-10 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 10/12/2011 13:04, Michael Biebl wrote: > Is there any progress on this? > > I've been bitten by this bug on several production redmine instances > when we installed the security updates. > It's not acceptable that a security update breaks in such a way in stable. > > I currently have those pac

Bug#629067: libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2011-12-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Is there any progress on this? I've been bitten by this bug on several production redmine instances when we installed the security updates. It's not acceptable that a security update breaks in such a way in stable. I currently have those packages on hold, which is obviously not an acceptable solu

Bug#629067: libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2011-10-12 Thread Felix Geyer
I think this can be fixed by replacing html = content_tag("a", name || email_address_obfuscated.html_safe, html_options.merge({ "href" => "mailto:"+html_escape(email_address)+extras })) with html = content_tag("a", name || html_escape(email_address_obfuscated), html_options.

Bug#629067: libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2011-09-05 Thread Ondřej Surý
Resending to correct redmine address, please use this email of fix the address in the previous email to redm...@packages.debian.org O. On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 17:05, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hmm, > > you're right the reassignment was wrong. I missed that when I was reassigning > the bugs to new packa

Bug#629067: libactionpack-ruby: libactionpack update breaks redmine

2011-09-05 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hmm, you're right the reassignment was wrong. I missed that when I was reassigning the bugs to new packages. I thought I already sent that to redmine maintainer and the result was that it's the redmine which needs the update. On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:10, Jérémy Lal wrote: > On 09/06/2011 10:18