Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 627711 + pending
Bug #627711 [xchat-gnome] xchat-gnome: the connect window doesn't provide list
of servers
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
627711: http://bugs.debian.org
tags 627711 + pending
thanks
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 06:04:51PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Theppitak Karo
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 06:04:51PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> > wrote:
> >
> >> GNOME #656069 filed:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cg
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> wrote:
>
>> GNOME #656069 filed:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656069
>
> FYI, the bug has been fixed upstream.
May I request for a new upstream sna
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> GNOME #656069 filed:
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656069
FYI, the bug has been fixed upstream.
Regards,
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> But, yes, as you request this, I can forward it upstream (probably with
> different patch) soon.
GNOME #656069 filed:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656069
Regards,
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Could you forward this issue upstream and get a review of the patch from the
> upstream maintainer.
> Looks like an upstream bug, so it should be fixed there.
Sure. I didn't do this before for some reasons: I was not familiar with upstream
Hi,
Am 06.08.2011 06:09, schrieb Theppitak Karoonboonyanan:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> wrote:
>
>> I think I've found a more correct patch: the "toplevel" scrolled box
>> should be re-parented from the Glade design to the actual dialog's
>> vbox.
>>
>> With th
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> I think I've found a more correct patch: the "toplevel" scrolled box
> should be re-parented from the Glade design to the actual dialog's
> vbox.
>
> With this, I also fix the dcc-dialog (file transfer) in the same manner.
Any p
tags 627711 + patch
thanks
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> I've been trying to fix this for myself, the derived ConnectDialog class
> appears to partially use the glade UI file, not the whole. Only the
> GtkScrolledWindow and GtkTreeView are referenced, not e
Package: xchat-gnome
Version: 1:0.30.0~git20100421.29cc76-1
Followup-For: Bug #627711
I've been trying to fix this for myself, the derived ConnectDialog class
appears to partially use the glade UI file, not the whole. Only the
GtkScrolledWindow and GtkTreeView are referenced, not even the action
b
11 matches
Mail list logo