On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 21:08 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
> > Now that squeeze is released I should really start that transition...
> >
> > Unfortunately, the diff of r12620 does not apply to swig 2.0.3 as it
> > depends on a bunch of other changes.
>
> Packaging a VCS snapshot of swig2.0? :)
Am 17.04.2011 10:21, schrieb Torsten Landschoff:
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 16:10 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
>>> I am sorry to say that it is non-trivial to merge a fix to this bug.
>>> Upstream revision 12620 contains the fix according to the upstream bug.
>>> However, the fix is not released y
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 16:10 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> > I am sorry to say that it is non-trivial to merge a fix to this bug.
> > Upstream revision 12620 contains the fix according to the upstream bug.
> > However, the fix is not released yet and will only make it into SWIG
> > 2.0.4 which ac
Am 16.04.2011 16:07, schrieb Torsten Landschoff:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 13:03 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> Package: swig
>> Version: 1.3.40-3
>> Severity: critical
>> Tags: upstream
>> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>>
>> See upstream bug:
>> http://sourceforge.net/t
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 13:03 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Package: swig
> Version: 1.3.40-3
> Severity: critical
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> See upstream bug:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101645&aid=3057804&group_id=1645
>
>
Package: swig
Version: 1.3.40-3
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
Justification: breaks unrelated software
See upstream bug:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=101645&aid=3057804&group_id=1645
This bug prevents me from building e.g. znc (and so on also prevents me from
fixing anothe
6 matches
Mail list logo
