On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:30:33AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you working on an updated squeeze package for this? If not, I'll
> prepare one for a DSA since the patch is fairly straightforward.
>
If you could do an update for Squeeze I'd really appreciate it.
signature.asc
De
Hi,
Are you working on an updated squeeze package for this? If not, I'll
prepare one for a DSA since the patch is fairly straightforward.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:09:30PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 07:58:24 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:51:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmm, that was a misunderstanding, then: It was tagged by release managers
> > > as
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 07:58:24 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:51:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, that was a misunderstanding, then: It was tagged by release managers as
> > not-a-blocker, i.e. it doesn't hold back the release if not fixed, a fix
> >
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:51:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>
> Hmm, that was a misunderstanding, then: It was tagged by release managers as
> not-a-blocker, i.e. it doesn't hold back the release if not fixed, a fix
> through unstable would still have been possible. Any way, not it's too
>
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 06:33:04AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:15:39PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> >
> > Why was there no maintainer reaction since a week? No we need to prepare
> > a DSA for this :-/
> >
>
> There was no maintainer reaction because I thought
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 09:15:39PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>
> Why was there no maintainer reaction since a week? No we need to prepare
> a DSA for this :-/
>
There was no maintainer reaction because I thought previous responses were
that it was okay to deal with post-release. Is this no
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:24:19PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Package: isc-dhcp-server
> Version: 4.1.1-P1-15
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security patch
>
> Hi Ari,
>
> Just as a public record, the following advisory (CVE-2011-0413[0]) has been
> published by ISC[1]:
>
> > When the DHCPv6 s
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 15:24:19 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi Ari,
Andrew, of course :)
(Thanks to adsb for pointing it out)
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
> usertag 611217 + squeeze-can-defer
Bug#611217: CVE-2011-0413: crash after DHCPv6 decline message
There w
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 611217 + squeeze-can-defer
tag 611217 + squeeze-ignore
thanks
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 15:24 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > When the DHCPv6 server code processes a message for an address that was
> > previously declined and internally tagged as
Package: isc-dhcp-server
Version: 4.1.1-P1-15
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi Ari,
Just as a public record, the following advisory (CVE-2011-0413[0]) has been
published by ISC[1]:
> When the DHCPv6 server code processes a message for an address that was
> previously declined and interna
12 matches
Mail list logo
