Julien Cristau writes:
> Any progress with that? If a fix is not forthcoming in the next few
> days I'll have to remove ksplice from squeeze.
I got the following reply:
From: Keith Winstein
Subject: Re: Comments requested on a patch
To: Luca Bruno
Cc: de...@ksplice.com, Timo Juhani Lindfors
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:30:20 +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
> tag 606282 + confirmed
> tag 606282 + pending
> thanks
>
> brian m. carlson scrisse:
>
> > ksplice-objmanip needs to link statically with libbfd. According to
> > the binutils-dev package description:
>
> Brian is completely right on
Luca Bruno writes:
> Brian is completely right on this, and I've just done that.
> Anyway, I'm waiting for feedback from Timo, who has submitted a patch
> to upstream to ensure compatibility with oue 2.6.32 stock kernel.
My emails to de...@ksplice.com seem to persistently bounce with an
error fro
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 606282 + confirmed
Bug #606282 [ksplice] ksplice-objmanip depends on wrong version of libbfd
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> tag 606282 + pending
Bug #606282 [ksplice] ksplice-objmanip depends on wrong version of libbfd
Added tag(s) pending.
> thank
tag 606282 + confirmed
tag 606282 + pending
thanks
brian m. carlson scrisse:
> ksplice-objmanip needs to link statically with libbfd. According to
> the binutils-dev package description:
Brian is completely right on this, and I've just done that.
Anyway, I'm waiting for feedback from Timo, who
ksplice-objmanip needs to link statically with libbfd. According to the
binutils-dev package description:
Note that building Debian packages which depend on the shared libbfd
is Not Allowed.
If you build dynamically, then you'll have to do a binNMU every time the
binutils package gets update
6 matches
Mail list logo
