On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:16:46PM +0100, Emmanuel wrote:
>
> I've been building my own kernels since 0.9x versions... and I like
> stability.
nice, but irrelevant 0.9 pointer.
2.6.32 is the stable branch.
2.6.30 is long fucked, please wake up.
the ide stack is dead, switch to libata
or bette
Hello,
I've been building my own kernels since 0.9x versions... and I like stability.
Actually I haven't moved my boots that are still managed by lilo and
didn't get time to upgrade to other bootloaders, so debian kernels are
not possible at the time.
I expect I am not the only one having
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:54:48PM +0100, epierre wrote:
>
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.30.10 (PREEMPT)
why are you using that homewgrown unsupported linux-2.6?
Seriously dude this is ridiculous, reproduce on up to date
standard linux-2.6 debian image and then maybe one could
start talking about the s
Package: udev
Version: 164-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
problem started with version 163, no hda,b,c,d disk detected although the
system booted on hda1, they are present in sys/blocks/... but not found (unknow
to fdisk and so on...)
installed 164-1 but hald (see
4 matches
Mail list logo
