Victor Seva:
> What is the priority? Upgrade the package to 1.4.1? Fix the issues on
> 1.4.0?
Hi Victor,
thank you very much for the offer. I think having version 1.4.1 should be the
minimum requirement for Debian Squeeze. However I'm afraid we won't be allowed
to do any additional upload for Sq
Hi Jan-Pascal and Thomas,
On 11/07/2010 21:37, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
> On 11/07/2010 11:38 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> > Package: solr
>
> > Severity: serious
>
> > Tags: squeeze
>
> >
>> I've written a mail ("Remove Solr from Squeeze?") on 2010/10/12 to
>> debian-java and the package's mai
On 11/07/2010 11:38 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Package: solr
> Severity: serious
> Tags: squeeze
>
> I've written a mail ("Remove Solr from Squeeze?") on 2010/10/12 to
> debian-java and the package's maintainer Jan-Pascal van Best and
> proposed the removal of solr from Squeeze, mainly because:
>
> -
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 11:38 +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
> I've written a mail ("Remove Solr from Squeeze?") on 2010/10/12 to
> debian-java and the package's maintainer Jan-Pascal van Best and
> proposed the removal of solr from Squeeze, mainly because:
>
> - - it's already outdated a year by now (se
Package: solr
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've written a mail ("Remove Solr from Squeeze?") on 2010/10/12 to
debian-java and the package's maintainer Jan-Pascal van Best and
proposed the removal of solr from Squeeze, mainly because:
- - it's al
5 matches
Mail list logo
