2011/1/25 Luca Capello :
It's also in lenny (albeit in contrib) so if it were removed then a
migration path for those users to a replacement would be good.
>>
>> Given that chef-solr was not in lenny, the above applies to solr only.
>> However, I should say that I do not know at all a goo
Hi there!
> Cc:ing all the people that have interacted with this bug.
Still true, but this is the last email about this subject from me.
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:47:41 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> Some hints about the chef package in Debian:
>
> - Debian has (6-month-old) 0.8.16-4.1, while upstrea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 605277 chef
Bug #605277 [solr] chef: remove from squeeze because of solr (#602697)?
Bug reassigned from package 'solr' to 'chef'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 0.8.16-4.1.
> found 605277 0.8.16-4.1
Bug #605277 [chef] chef: rem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 602697 -1
Bug#602697: should not be included in squeeze
Bug 602697 cloned as bug 605277.
> retitle -1 chef: remove from squeeze because of solr (#602697)?
Bug #605277 [solr] should not be included in squeeze
Changed Bug title to 'chef: remo
clone 602697 -1
retitle -1 chef: remove from squeeze because of solr (#602697)?
found -1 0.8.16-4.1
block 602697 by -1
thanks
Hi there!
Cc:ing all the people that have interacted with this bug.
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:52:24 +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt:
>> On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 11:
Adam D. Barratt:
> On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 11:38 +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
> > I've written a mail ("Remove Solr from Squeeze?") on 2010/10/12 to
> > debian-java and the package's maintainer Jan-Pascal van Best and
> > proposed the removal of solr from Squeeze, mainly because:
> >
> > - - it's alrea
6 matches
Mail list logo
