On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:31:56 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> However, given the past history and the tight coupling with gdb, I
> suspect 0.05-1 in wheezy is also affected. Tagging 'sid' for now (and
> I hope that's the right thing to do), but it would be good to verify if
> it currently builds in wheez
Hi,
These two CPAN Testers reports (on amd64) look a bit like the build
failure we are experiencing:
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/c601e674-9a7d-11e1-98bb-209ec6a682bc
http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/f03c7e5a-9ae0-11e1-9b6c-a51c4701def4
Unfortunately, the reports don't mentio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 602668 serious
Bug #602668 [libdevel-bt-perl] libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> tag 602668 sid
Bug #602668 [libdevel-bt-perl] libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
Added tag(s) sid.
> thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 602668 important
Bug #602668 [libdevel-bt-perl] libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> clone 602668 -1
Bug#602668: libdevel-bt-perl: FTBFS on armel
Bug 602668 cloned as
severity 602668 important
clone 602668 -1
retitle -1 gdb: 7.2 falsely (?) shows stack corruption on armel
reassign -1 gdb 7.2-1
block 602668 with -1
thanks
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 11:15:01PM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> Package: libdevel-bt-perl
> Version: 0.05-1
> Severity: serious
It's never bui
tag 602668 + confirmed
thanks
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:15:01 +, Hector Oron wrote:
> Your package fails to build on armel with following error:
I can reproduce the test failures on abel (armel) and asdfasdf
(kfreebsd-amd64) when running the tests manually:
armel:
(sid)gre...@abel:~/src/libde
Package: libdevel-bt-perl
Version: 0.05-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
Your package fails to build on armel with following error:
Test Summary Report
---
t/basic.t (Wstat: 1280 Tests: 5 Failed: 5)
Failed tests: 1-5
Non-zero exit status: 5
Files=4, Tests=5, 9 wa
7 matches
Mail list logo
