Heya! I'm being for boyfriend!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
599523: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599523
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: update-manager-gnome
Version: 0.200.4-1
Severity
t pulling in GNOME PackageKit does make sense, so
after some thinking my favourite option would be (b) with just
Recommends to GNOME PackageKit and disabled or reduced actions if the
Recommends is not fulfilled.
Nevertheless, I'd say that all these three options are rather relevant
for Jes
(replying to Axel)
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 05:58:02PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 28.10.2012 12:52, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> On 16.06.2012 18:50, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> >>> Is there any progress on this serious bug? It is now unhandled for more
> >>> than
On 28.10.2012 12:52, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 16.06.2012 18:50, Arne Wichmann wrote:
>>> Is there any progress on this serious bug? It is now unhandled for more
>>> than one year.
>>
>> update-manager is basically unmaintained atm.
>
> So what about RFA'ing update-
Hi,
Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 16.06.2012 18:50, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> > Is there any progress on this serious bug? It is now unhandled for more
> > than one year.
>
> update-manager is basically unmaintained atm.
So what about RFA'ing update-manager then at least?
Ignoring the epoch, Ubuntu ha
On 16.06.2012 18:50, Arne Wichmann wrote:
> Is there any progress on this serious bug? It is now unhandled for more
> than one year.
update-manager is basically unmaintained atm.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
Is there any progress on this serious bug? It is now unhandled for more
than one year.
cu
AW
--
[...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are
coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support
it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debia
Package: update-manager-core
Version: 0.200.5-1
Severity: normal
Please type your report here.
The text will be wrapped to be max 79 chars long per line.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 599523 squeeze-can-defer
tag 599523 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 14:01:19 +0200, Zoran Dzelajlija wrote:
> Package: update-manager-gnome
> Version: 0.200.4-1
> Severity: serious
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 599523 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#599523: [update-manager-gnome] wants to downgrade packages without any
Hi,
On 10/21/2010 11:25 PM, Zoran Dželajlija wrote:
>> Candidate is 7.7.1-4, NOT your wanted 7.8.2-2.
>
> Indeed, but a downgrade must not be attempted at priority 700 or even 990.
> The relevant passage from apt_preferences(5) seem to be:
I know that part of apt_preferences(5) and your assumti
Hi,
Quoting Evgeni Golov (evg...@debian.org):
> Hi Zoran,
>
> I fear your problem is your pinning.
I believe the problem is update-manager does not behave like
apt-preferences(5) says APT (or presumably any package manager) should.
Some reasoning below.
> > $ apt-cache policy libgl1-mesa-dri
>
Hi Zoran,
I fear your problem is your pinning.
> $ apt-cache policy libgl1-mesa-dri
> libgl1-mesa-dri:
> Installed: 7.8.2-2
> Candidate: 7.7.1-4
> Package pin: 7.7.1-4
> Version table:
> *** 7.8.2-2 990
> 200 http://debian.iskon.hr/debian/ experimental/main i386 Packages
>
Package: update-manager-gnome
Version: 0.200.4-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
update-manager wants to downgrade a package I explicitely installed from
experimental without any special notice. This downgrade would break
functionality on my machine. apt and a
15 matches
Mail list logo
