Hi,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 06:38:26PM +0200, Luca Bruno wrote:
> tag 597932 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
> attached a complete patch to fix compilation on both armel and hurd.
> I have a NMU ready, tell me if I should proceed with it or if you prefer
> to handle this.
Thanks a lot, feel free to NMU
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 597932
> https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-September/016570.html
Bug #597932 [openocd] openocd FTBFS on armel and hurd
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/20
forwarded 597932
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-September/016570.html
thanks
Tormod Volden scrisse:
> I can not talk for the maintainer, but I will encourage you to submit
> the patch on the upstream ML
> http://openocd.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=openocd/op
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
>
> Moreover, the patch for armel should really be sent upstream.
> Would you take care of this (if you are in touch with authors) or should
> I do it?
Hi Luca,
I can not talk for the maintainer, but I will encourage you to submit
the patch on th
tag 597932 + patch
thanks
Hi,
attached a complete patch to fix compilation on both armel and hurd.
I have a NMU ready, tell me if I should proceed with it or if you prefer
to handle this.
Moreover, the patch for armel should really be sent upstream.
Would you take care of this (if you are in touc
Package: openocd
Version: 0.4.0-1
Severity: serious
openocd currently fails to build on hurd and armel, and this fact prevented
0.4.0 from entering squeeze till now. See
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=openocd;ver=0.4.0-1;arch=hurd-i386;stamp=1269698459
and
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.
6 matches
Mail list logo
