On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 13:36 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV writes:
>
> > Thanks Aaron, I noticed this.
>
> No problem; thanks for the quick response.
>
> > What's the best way around it, while preserving the performance of a
> > parallel build?
>
> Declaring
>
> .NOTPARALLEL:
Adam C Powell IV writes:
> Thanks Aaron, I noticed this.
No problem; thanks for the quick response.
> What's the best way around it, while preserving the performance of a
> parallel build?
Declaring
.NOTPARALLEL:
in debian/rules should cause make to run serially when working off of
it but st
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 595260 pending
Bug #595260 [salome] salome: FTBFS in parallel: cleanup/doc-installation race
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
595260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
tags 595260 pending
thanks
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:20 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Package: salome
> Version: 5.1.3-10
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> The automatic build of salome on i386, which appears to have been in
> parallel, ran into what looks like a
Package: salome
Version: 5.1.3-10
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
The automatic build of salome on i386, which appears to have been in
parallel, ran into what looks like a race condition between cleaning
subtrees after building their contents and building and installing
5 matches
Mail list logo