On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:41:45 -0700
Steve Langasek wrote:
> The only thing I'm lost on is how the submitter managed to upgrade *to*
> 2.4.23-2 in the first place.
>
If it can clarify anything.
From my log:
[UPGRADE] slapd 2.4.21-1 -> 2.4.23-1
[UPGRADE] slapd 2.4.23-1 -> 2.4.23-2
[UPGRADE] slapd
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:55:55PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:19:55 -0700
> >Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >>What version was being migrated from (i.e., what version of BDB was
> >>openldap linked against?). If it was prior to BDB 4.8, then you have to
> >>do a sl
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 13:55:55 -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> I'd also note that BDB 4.8 versions prior to 4.8.30 are not reliable
> and should be avoided (Not sure what's in debian atm).
>
4.8.30 :)
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--On August 19, 2010 10:41:51 PM +0200 Michael Rasmussen
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:19:55 -0700
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
What version was being migrated from (i.e., what version of BDB was
openldap linked against?). If it was prior to BDB 4.8, then you have to
do a slapcat/slapadd
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:19:55 -0700
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
> What version was being migrated from (i.e., what version of BDB was openldap
> linked against?). If it was prior to BDB 4.8, then you have to do a
> slapcat/slapadd of the database (I assume that's already being done), but
> b
--On August 19, 2010 11:03:19 AM +0200 Matthijs Mohlmann
wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
Hi,
A way to fix this:
apt-get install db4.7-util
cd /var/lib/ldap
db4.7_checkpoint -1
db4.7_recover
dpkg --configure -a
Thanks for the fix, but I do not understand w
6 matches
Mail list logo
