Bug#591419: librmagick-ruby should not be installable with imagemagick

2016-12-05 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:18:07AM +0100, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > However, I fail to see how this would fix the issue, since it won't help > > with the very problem that a new version of ImageMagick that has no > > SONAME bump breaks ruby-rmagick. > > So you're right that it does not "fix" the

Bug#591419: librmagick-ruby should not be installable with imagemagick

2016-12-05 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 03.12.2016 [10:24:19 -0200], Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:12:21AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Package: ruby-rmagick > > Version: 2.15.4+dfsg-2 > > Followup-For: Bug #591419 > > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > > Usertags: origin-ubuntu zesty ubuntu-patch >

Bug#591419: librmagick-ruby should not be installable with imagemagick

2016-12-03 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:12:21AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Package: ruby-rmagick > Version: 2.15.4+dfsg-2 > Followup-For: Bug #591419 > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu zesty ubuntu-patch > > I think this should do what is expected. Basically, AIUI, there i

Bug#591419: librmagick-ruby should not be installable with imagemagick

2016-12-02 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
Package: ruby-rmagick Version: 2.15.4+dfsg-2 Followup-For: Bug #591419 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu zesty ubuntu-patch I think this should do what is expected. Basically, AIUI, there is a more-than-ABI-specifiable (due to issues upstream and possibly in the Debian pa