Dear Norbert,
> That is right, but still it is a bug of ghostscript and should
> be treated there, not anywhere else.
Yes. And when they advise you to use -P- (and refuse to make that the
default), you just need to follow: you need to change. (But yes, such
a gs requirement, leaving it "insecure
On Di, 01 Jun 2010, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
> The bug affects all users of ghostscript. They know that to be
That is right, but still it is a bug of ghostscript and should
be treated there, not anywhere else.
Furthermore, gs is not run with extended priviliges, so that
does not compromise
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2007.dfsg.2-4+lenny2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please note remote execute-any-code security bugs in ghostscript:
http://bugs.debian.org/583183
This package suggests ghostscript, and may be affected. Please
evaluate the
3 matches
Mail list logo
