Dear Mehdi,
> On a side note, you should check ...
> In case, it isn't obvious: I already read 583183 before closing and I
> explained why advi-examples isn't open to such flaws.
I see: that comment was not directed at me.
Thanks, Paul
Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.
On 01/06/2010 14:26, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
> Dear Mehdi,
>
On a side note, you should check ...
>>>
>>> Thanks for that pointer. I guess you are right. But please see...
>>
>> No.
>
> Sorry, but I do not understand. Do you mean that you refuse to read,
> or that you disagree? May
Dear Mehdi,
>>> On a side note, you should check ...
>>
>> Thanks for that pointer. I guess you are right. But please see...
>
> No.
Sorry, but I do not understand. Do you mean that you refuse to read, or
that you disagree? Maybe you would care to explain, I would like to know
your opinion.
Chee
On 01/06/2010 14:07, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
> Dear Mehdi,
>
>> On a side note, you should check ...
>
> Thanks for that pointer. I guess you are right. But please see…
No.
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.
Package: advi-examples
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Please note remote execute-any-code security bugs in ghostscript:
http://bugs.debian.org/583183
This package depends on ghostscript, and may be affected. Please
evaluate the security of this package, and f
5 matches
Mail list logo