Bug#582313: Keeping python-clamav in Squeeze

2010-08-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
"Philipp Kern" wrote: >On 08/07/2010 05:09 PM, Cédric Delfosse wrote: >> Le vendredi 06 août 2010 à 23:31 -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit : >> >>> If it's decided to release Squeeze with clamav, I think it would be good to >>> keep python-clamav too. The main use case is for admins who have

Bug#582313: Keeping python-clamav in Squeeze

2010-08-15 Thread Philipp Kern
On 08/07/2010 05:09 PM, Cédric Delfosse wrote: Le vendredi 06 août 2010 à 23:31 -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit : If it's decided to release Squeeze with clamav, I think it would be good to keep python-clamav too. The main use case is for admins who have written their own scripts. I don't t

Bug#582313: Keeping python-clamav in Squeeze

2010-08-07 Thread Cédric Delfosse
Le vendredi 06 août 2010 à 23:31 -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit : > If it's decided to release Squeeze with clamav, I think it would be good to > keep python-clamav too. The main use case is for admins who have written > their own scripts. > > I don't think it will be that difficult to keep up.

Bug#582313: Keeping python-clamav in Squeeze

2010-08-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
If it's decided to release Squeeze with clamav, I think it would be good to keep python-clamav too. The main use case is for admins who have written their own scripts. I don't think it will be that difficult to keep up. Clamav upstream is doing a better job with maintaining ABI compatibility.