Bug#576511: Info received (Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions)

2012-10-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:02:39AM +0100, Philipp Hug wrote: > > In fact, if you had been listening to me from day one, you'd realize > > that I'm not even asking you to actually fix this problem. > > I'm merely asking you to make the users who aren't using your personally > > preferred use case, b

Bug#576511: Info received (Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions)

2012-10-29 Thread Philipp Hug
> In fact, if you had been listening to me from day one, you'd realize > that I'm not even asking you to actually fix this problem. > I'm merely asking you to make the users who aren't using your personally > preferred use case, but are nevertheless using an apparently valid and > supported use cas

Processed: Re: Bug#576511: Info received (Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions)

2012-10-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 critical Bug #576511 [drbd8-utils] drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions for various drbd fault conditions - may cause dataloss. Severity set to 'critical' from 'important' -- 576511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576511 De

Bug#576511: Info received (Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions)

2012-10-27 Thread Philipp Hug
control: severity -1 important Josip, Please don't upgrade the severity of this bug. The defaults actually prevent further data loss for the majority of drbd users. In the normal setup the drbd device is the main storage device so the defaults make sense. If you have a suggestion for a better d

Processed: Re: Bug#576511: Info received (Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions)

2012-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #576511 [drbd8-utils] drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions for various drbd fault conditions - may cause dataloss. Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' -- 576511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576511 D

Bug#576511: Info received (Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions)

2012-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
Following on Philipp's comment, I went looking for explanation in the old template config file changes, and found the sysrq calls added with no obvious explanation here: http://git.drbd.org/gitweb.cgi?p=drbd-8.3.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b4452d69b4371dbeee5a38f2e248a6360c14c77 But this is still conditio

Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions

2012-10-26 Thread Philipp Hug
Hi Josip > Actually, I think a general sync wasn't previously added in that situation > because it might cause a problem with the filesystem on the faulty DRBD > device itself, thereby causing the problem b) you described. That's why I put in "sync &" then sleep and reboot. But it's just an idea.

Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions

2012-10-26 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:29:47PM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote: > It should probably be changed into something like this: > "/usr/lib/drbd/notify-emergency-reboot.sh; reboot -f &; sync &; sleep 30; > echo > b > /proc/sysrq-trigger"; > So, we'd have at least time to sync other file systems and try to

Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions

2012-10-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
control: severity -1 important > These defaults are really bad. > > I had this happen to a machine running DRBD yesterday: > > block drbd0: PingAck did not arrive in time. > block drbd0: peer( Secondary -> Unknown ) conn( Connected -> NetworkFailure ) > pdsk( UpToDate -> DUnknown ) > block drbd0: