On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:01:01 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> newt has its own copy of the libgpm source
Eww. Shouldn't that get changed?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Alastair McKinstry, le Wed 03 Mar 2010 10:09:05 +, a écrit :
> I hadn't noticed this before - why does newt have its own copy of libgpm
> (or why isn't libgpm-dev available for kfreebsd, etc) ?
gpm itself is quite linux-specific in many ways, to handle VT
multiplexing and such in the gpm daemo
Ok,
I hadn't noticed this before - why does newt have its own copy of libgpm
(or why isn't libgpm-dev available for kfreebsd, etc) ?
Regards
Alastair
On 2010-03-03 10:01, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Package: newt
Version: 0.52.10-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: FTBFS on kfreebsd
Hel
Package: newt
Version: 0.52.10-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: FTBFS on kfreebsd
Hello,
Please drop the libgpm-dev dependency completely. Contrary to what the
name suggests, gpm support in newt doesn't need libgpm, as newt has its
own copy of the libgpm source (and it makes it FTBF
4 matches
Mail list logo
