2010/5/13 Raphael Hertzog :
> On Wed, 12 May 2010, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> On May 12, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>>
>> > Good that i am not a developer so i can say crap and ask afterwards
>> > for pointers to a documentation which tells me why udev can't e.g.
>> > Breaks: linux-image-686 (<< x), li
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Thu, 13 May 2010, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> The only affect I see this will have is that an installed linux-image meta
>> package will be updated. That might get a new kernel installed or not.
>
> If the minimal version is carefully chosen, it will ensure a new k
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 12, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
> > Good that i am not a developer so i can say crap and ask afterwards
> > for pointers to a documentation which tells me why udev can't e.g.
> > Breaks: linux-image-686 (<< x), linux-image-amd64 (<< x), ?
> *Break
On Thu, 13 May 2010, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The only affect I see this will have is that an installed linux-image meta
> package will be updated. That might get a new kernel installed or not.
If the minimal version is carefully chosen, it will ensure a new kernel is
installed. That's the st
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On May 12, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
>> Good that i am not a developer so i can say crap and ask afterwards
>> for pointers to a documentation which tells me why udev can't e.g.
>> Breaks: linux-image-686 (<< x), linux-image-amd64 (<< x), ?
> *Breaks* may
On May 12, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Good that i am not a developer so i can say crap and ask afterwards
> for pointers to a documentation which tells me why udev can't e.g.
> Breaks: linux-image-686 (<< x), linux-image-amd64 (<< x), ?
*Breaks* may work, dependencies are not acceptable.
Are the
2010/5/12 Marco d'Itri :
> On May 12, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
>> It would be really cool if udev could depend on the new kernel - or
> Developers are supposed to know that other packages cannot depend on
> kernel packages.
Good that i am not a developer so i can say crap and ask afterwards
fo
On May 12, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> It would be really cool if udev could depend on the new kernel - or
Developers are supposed to know that other packages cannot depend on
kernel packages.
> If udev really can't depend on the kernel i can only think of a note in the
> Releasenotes and a debc
Hi *,
2010/5/7 Raphael Hertzog :
> Dear APT developers, the udev preinst tries to detect if a newer kernel is
> going to be installed by analyzing the dpkg command line. Unfortunately
> the kernel package can be installed by APT in a different dpkg run
> than the one where udev is installed and th
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 26, Drew Miller wrote:
>
> > For me, this bug blocked my upgrade from Stable to Lenny, at least
> > until I read the error message. It would be great if this was fixed.
> It would be great if somebody could provide a fix.
It would be great if you
On Apr 26, Drew Miller wrote:
> For me, this bug blocked my upgrade from Stable to Lenny, at least
> until I read the error message. It would be great if this was fixed.
It would be great if somebody could provide a fix.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
For me, this bug blocked my upgrade from Stable to Lenny, at least
until I read the error message. It would be great if this was fixed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
