Processed: Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 570064 normal Bug #570064 [diffutils] non-backwards compatible change in diff output with binary files Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tra

Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

severity 570064 normal thanks Raphael Hertzog escribió: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Santiago Vila wrote: >> BTW: The BTS allows a bug to be assigned to multiple packages. I think >> a reassign to "dpkg-dev,diffutils" would have worked. > > It does, but it's not recommended any more because once you rea

Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Santiago Vila wrote: > > You close the one in diffutils, I close the one in dpkg-dev once > > it supports the new output. > > This is what I find confusing from a "formal" point of view. > > Either the bug is in diffutils or it is in dpkg-dev. One of the two > have to be chan

Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Santiago Vila wrote: > > That dpkg and diffutils 2.9-1 can't work together is obvious. > > That such fact is due to a bug in diffutils is what I'm unsure about. > > > > My idea was to reassign the bug back to dpkg-dev so that you

Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Santiago Vila wrote: > That dpkg and diffutils 2.9-1 can't work together is obvious. > That such fact is due to a bug in diffutils is what I'm unsure about. > > My idea was to reassign the bug back to dpkg-dev so that you can close > it whenever it's adapted to the new diff be

Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > BTW: I have not closed the bug in the upload, as I'm not convinced > > that it's a bug in diffutils: If you write a program (dpkg-dev) which > > relies on the console output of another progam (diff), being that a > > dangerous thing, then you should

Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Santiago Vila wrote: > I have not included the part about moving to 3.0 source format. Sorry, > but I need some time to study that carefully and I need to be confortable > with the format before actually using it for the packages I maintain. Sure. > [ I wonder if it is accept

Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > I've prepared an NMU for diffutils (versioned as 1:2.9-1.1) and > > > uploaded it to DELAYED/01. Please feel free to tell me if I > > > should delay it long

Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I've prepared an NMU for diffutils (versioned as 1:2.9-1.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/01. Please feel free to tell me if I > > should delay it longer. > > Please delay the NMU several days. > > I'm al

Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > tags 570064 + patch > thanks > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for diffutils (versioned as 1:2.9-1.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/01. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. Please delay the NMU several days. I'm ali

Bug#570064: diffutils: diff for NMU version 1:2.9-1.1

tags 570064 + patch thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for diffutils (versioned as 1:2.9-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/01. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- Raphaël Hertzog diff -Nru diffutils-2.9/debian/changelog diffutils-2.9/debian/changelog --