Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> python-turbogears has been fixed and migrated to testing, so presumably it
> can be turned into an RM request now?
Please go ahead. Please use 'affects' so the bug gets punched through to
here.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:57:38AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Thanks; I think it's time to remove this package. The only reverse-
> dependency is python-turbogears which appears to be bogus (filed as
> #569093).
>
> Once that is fixed, this package should be removed (and not released with
> squeez
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:57:38AM +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Thanks; I think it's time to remove this package. The only reverse-
> dependency is python-turbogears which appears to be bogus (filed as
> #569093).
>
> Once that is fixed, this package should be removed (and not released with
> squeez
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 568232 by 569093
Bug #568232 [python-dispatch] python-dispatch: Not compatible with Python 2.6
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 568232: 569093
> severity 568232 serious
Bug #568232 [python-dispatch] python-dispatch: Not
4 matches
Mail list logo