Bug#564080: Bug#562884: proposals

2010-04-18 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sonntag, 18. April 2010, Julien Cristau wrote: > I don't think there's anything the screensavers can sensibly do there. > So I'm going to close this bug. 564079 is the same bug but for kscreensaver, closing this one too. > Version 2.6.32-9 of the Debian kernel includes a change by Bastian

Bug#564080: Bug#562884: proposals

2010-01-07 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2010, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 16:39:05 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > IMO either the screensaver should disable sysrq while it's locked (and > > enable it after locking) or the screensaver shouldnt lock the screen, > > when sysrq is enabled (an

Bug#562884: proposals

2010-01-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 16:39:05 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > IMO either the screensaver should disable sysrq while it's locked (and enable > it after locking) or the screensaver shouldnt lock the screen, when sysrq is > enabled (and output a warning message). > X screen savers don't run as ro

Bug#562884: proposals

2010-01-07 Thread Holger Levsen
clone 562884 -1 clone 562884 -2 reassign -1 gnome-screensaver reassign -2 kscreensaver thanks Hi, IMO either the screensaver should disable sysrq while it's locked (and enable it after locking) or the screensaver shouldnt lock the screen, when sysrq is enabled (and output a warning message).