On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 16:06:58 +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> Dne Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:47:31 +
> Julien Cristau napsal(a):
>
> > A Conflicts is not an appropriate solution when two packages provide the
> > same binary (with different functionality, which I assume is the case
> > here).
Hi
Dne Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:47:31 +
Julien Cristau napsal(a):
> A Conflicts is not an appropriate solution when two packages provide the
> same binary (with different functionality, which I assume is the case
> here).
Well it was some kind of short term solution, I'm working on proper one
wit
reopen 562228
kthxbye
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:24:01 +, Michal Čihař wrote:
>
> smem (0.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Use bash for capture example, it uses bashisms which are not easy to
> avoid.
>* Add conflict with secure-delete which also provides smem binary
> (C
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 562228
Bug #562228 {Done: Michal ÄihaÅ } [smem] Not installable.
Program name ( /usr/bin/smem) already exists in the secure-delete package
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'foun
4 matches
Mail list logo
