On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 00:20:49 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Are you saying people didn't check debootstrap before breaking it?
>
> AFAIK it was checked with running debootstrap which still works as
> expected except for the new variants...
>
Are you kidding me?
debootst
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 23:43:44 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>>> It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
>>> And it seems to be staying like this.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure when this happened, but apt used to be
>>> build-essential=y
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 23:43:44 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> >
> > It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
> > And it seems to be staying like this.
> >
> > I'm not sure when this happened, but apt used to be
> > build-essential=yes but now it's not.
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
> And it seems to be staying like this.
>
> I'm not sure when this happened, but apt used to be
> build-essential=yes but now it's not.
Are you saying that build-essential=yes was still in use?
It also look
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:08:31 +0900
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
with or by debootstrap?
works for me with plain 'sudo debootstrap sid debian/'
I: Retrieving Release
I: Retrieving Packages
I: Validating Packages
I: Resolving dependencies of
reassign 562143 ftp.debian.org
reopen 562143
thanks
Hi,
This bug is probably manifestation of ubuntu bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/germinate/+bug/254042
Apt is included in somewhere from Recommends, and is priority
important, so it is considered not build-essential; but it is
bu
Hmm... similar bug, one year ago.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/germinate/+bug/254042
At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:53:54 +0100,
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:28 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Sounds like a bug for debootstrap, no?
>
> Indeed!
>
> > At We
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 562143 ftp.debian.org
Bug #562143 {Done: Frans Pop } [debootstrap] fails on
cowbuilder --create
Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
> reopen 562143
Bug #562143 {Done: Frans Pop } [ftp.debian.org] fails on
cowb
It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
And it seems to be staying like this.
I'm not sure when this happened, but apt used to be
build-essential=yes but now it's not.
At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:53:54 +0100,
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:28 +0
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:28 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Sounds like a bug for debootstrap, no?
Indeed!
> At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:15:53 +0100,
> Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> >
> > Package: cowbuilder
> > Version: 0.60
> > Severity: grave
> >
> > I guess apt is missing ...
> >
> >
> > sudo cowb
Sounds like a bug for debootstrap, no?
At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:15:53 +0100,
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
>
> Package: cowbuilder
> Version: 0.60
> Severity: grave
>
> I guess apt is missing ...
>
>
> sudo cowbuilder --create
>
> -> Invoking pbuilder
> forking: pbuilder create --buildplace /var/
Package: cowbuilder
Version: 0.60
Severity: grave
I guess apt is missing ...
sudo cowbuilder --create
-> Invoking pbuilder
forking: pbuilder create --buildplace /var/cache/pbuilder/base.cow --mirror
ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian --distribution sid --no-targz --extrapackages
cowdancer
W:
12 matches
Mail list logo
