Processed: Bug#560238: net.ipv6.bindv6only configuration breaks xdmcp

2009-12-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # kdm > clone 560238 -1 Bug#560238: net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 breaks some buggy programs Bug 560238 cloned as bug 562804. > severity -1 critical Bug #562804 [netbase] net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 breaks some buggy programs Ignoring request to change severit

Bug#560238: net.ipv6.bindv6only configuration breaks xdmcp

2009-12-27 Thread Marco d'Itri
# kdm clone 560238 -1 severity -1 critical block 560238 by -1 # gdm severity 562126 critical block 560238 by 562126 thanks On Dec 10, Paul Seelig wrote: > > XDMCP is a protocol, which package is actually broken and how? > It was not possible anymore to connect to a remote system via xdmcp both >

Bug#560238: net.ipv6.bindv6only configuration breaks xdmcp

2009-12-12 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 13, Martin Roll wrote: > a similar problem now appears in sun-java6-plugin (6-17-1). http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560056 -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#560238: net.ipv6.bindv6only configuration breaks xdmcp

2009-12-12 Thread Martin Roll
Hi, a similar problem now appears in sun-java6-plugin (6-17-1). If bindv6only is set to 1 many java applets can no longer be processed properly. A simple example is the java installation test located at http://java.com/en/download/installed.jsp?detect=jre&try=1. The applet fails to load and throw

Bug#560238: net.ipv6.bindv6only configuration breaks xdmcp

2009-12-10 Thread Paul Seelig
On 12/10/2009 03:34 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > But was bindv6only=1 set on the client or on the server? > Both server and client had this very same setting and, acting as both server and client, none of both could see each other anymore. Once i removed the file from one of them, and after a reboot,

Bug#560238: net.ipv6.bindv6only configuration breaks xdmcp

2009-12-09 Thread Paul Seelig
On 12/10/2009 01:53 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > XDMCP is a protocol, which package is actually broken and how? > It was not possible anymore to connect to a remote system via xdmcp both via gdm and Xephyr. The remote X server appeared to have become completely unvisible within the local network.

Bug#560238: net.ipv6.bindv6only configuration breaks xdmcp

2009-12-09 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 10, Paul Seelig wrote: > On 12/10/2009 01:53 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > XDMCP is a protocol, which package is actually broken and how? > It was not possible anymore to connect to a remote system via xdmcp both > via gdm and Xephyr. The remote X server appeared to have become > completely

Bug#560238: net.ipv6.bindv6only configuration breaks xdmcp

2009-12-09 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 10, Paul Seelig wrote: > just want to remark that i actualy had to move the newly created file > /etc/sysctl.d/bindv6only.conf out of the way in order to restore the > xdmcp functionality it completely broke. XDMCP is a protocol, which package is actually broken and how? It should be fixed

Bug#560238: net.ipv6.bindv6only configuration breaks xdmcp

2009-12-09 Thread Paul Seelig
reopen 560238 ! # thanks Hi, just want to remark that i actualy had to move the newly created file /etc/sysctl.d/bindv6only.conf out of the way in order to restore the xdmcp functionality it completely broke. If you introduce new configuration files containing untested settings which might break