Hi Moritz!
Am Dienstag, den 08.12.2009, 22:28 +0100 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> You can leave etch and lenny untouched, the impact doesn't warrant an
> update.
Thanks for clarifying!
Best regards
Manuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:46:45PM +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> Hi Moritz!
>
> Am Dienstag, den 08.12.2009, 20:35 +0100 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> > You should rather use the copy of libltdl currently in the
> > archive or is there a technical reason, which prevents this?
>
> I'm aware of that
Hi Moritz!
Am Dienstag, den 08.12.2009, 20:35 +0100 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> You should rather use the copy of libltdl currently in the
> archive or is there a technical reason, which prevents this?
I'm aware of that and discussed it with upstream. They said it would
require quite some chang
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 01:42:23AM +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> Here's the debdiff. Changes are checked into our SVN repo.
>
> Best regards
> Manuel
You should rather use the copy of libltdl currently in the
archive or is there a technical reason, which prevents this?
Cheers,
Moritz
-
Manuel Prinz wrote:
> Hi Michael!
>
> Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 00:06 -0500 schrieb Michael Gilbert:
>> The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
>> published for libtool. I have determined that this package embeds a
>> vulnerable copy of the libtool source code. However, si
Here's the debdiff. Changes are checked into our SVN repo.
Best regards
Manuel
diff -u openmpi-1.3.3/debian/changelog openmpi-1.3.3/debian/changelog
--- openmpi-1.3.3/debian/changelog
+++ openmpi-1.3.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+openmpi (1.3.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fixed secur
Hi Michael!
Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 00:06 -0500 schrieb Michael Gilbert:
> The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published for libtool. I have determined that this package embeds a
> vulnerable copy of the libtool source code. However, since this is a
> mass bug fili
Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:30 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> Manuel, are you going to handle this issue or do you want me to do it ?
I can take care of that. I've forwarded this upstream already. The best
option would be having a fixed libtool available, or trying to use the
backported patch
Le lundi 07 décembre 2009 à 13:30 +0100, Manuel Prinz a écrit :
> Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:30 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
> > Manuel, are you going to handle this issue or do you want me to do it ?
>
> I can take care of that. I've forwarded this upstream already. The best
> option would b
Manuel, are you going to handle this issue or do you want me to do it ?
Thanks
Sylvestre
Le lundi 07 décembre 2009 à 00:06 -0500, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
> Package: openmpi
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> Hi,
>
> The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> published
Package: openmpi
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
The following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for libtool. I have determined that this package embeds a
vulnerable copy of the libtool source code. However, since this is a
mass bug filing (due to so many packages emb
11 matches
Mail list logo