Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 559659 + patch fixed-upstream pending
Bug #559659 [sbuild] sbuild: Targets unstable even when dealing with
experimental stuff
Added tag(s) pending, fixed-upstream, and patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
tags 559659 + patch fixed-upstream pending
thanks
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 07:06:42PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Roger.
>
> Roger Leigh (06/12/2009):
> > Currently, the reason why your uploads default to unstable is
> > because sbuild defaults to unstable unless you override it.
>
> Yeah
Hi Roger.
Roger Leigh (06/12/2009):
> Currently, the reason why your uploads default to unstable is
> because sbuild defaults to unstable unless you override it.
Yeah, I gathered that… :)
> I think the safest solution here is to simply not set it by default,
> and require the user to always spe
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 04:53:33AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> firstly, I'm aware of #529281, and I believe this might be different.
>
> I really don't see why the resulting distribution should be “unstable”
> when one uses:
> $ sbuild -c experimental-amd64-sbuild -s -A foo.dsc
>
> And when:
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.59.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Fucked my uploads.
Hi,
firstly, I'm aware of #529281, and I believe this might be different.
I really don't see why the resulting distribution should be “unstable”
when one uses:
$ sbuild -c experimental-amd64-sbuild -s -A foo.ds
5 matches
Mail list logo
