Bug#558001: FTBFS: too tight timeout in testsuite

2009-11-25 Thread Riku Voipio
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 02:41:38AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Is experimental armel buildd much faster? IIRC, it has managed to build cmake > in 2 hours (without testsuite). While unstable buildds typically needed ~5 > hours to build cmake 2.6.x/2.8.0-1 (without testsuite either). There is

Bug#558001: FTBFS: too tight timeout in testsuite

2009-11-25 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On trečiadienis 25 Lapkritis 2009 22:43:22 Riku Voipio wrote: > Package: cmake > Version: 2.8.0-4 > Severity: serious > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertag: eabi > > Considering the bootstraptest takes ~200 more time than other tests on > other archs too, this test should probably

Bug#558001: FTBFS: too tight timeout in testsuite

2009-11-25 Thread Riku Voipio
Package: cmake Version: 2.8.0-4 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertag: eabi Considering the bootstraptest takes ~200 more time than other tests on other archs too, this test should probably have bigger timeout than others. > 115/137 Test #115: CTestTestFailedSubmit-xmlrpc .