> > > Will do. It may take a few days as my development box is offline.
> >
> > Is your system back or should I do an NMU?
>
> I uploaded the revised package.
I cannot find it anywhere.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debi
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:31:25PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * beewoolie [2009-09-24 14:17]:
> > >[1] See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2009-09/msg00072.html
> > Will do. It may take a few days as my development box is offline.
>
> Is your system back or should I do an NMU?
Doing it right now.
BTW, this code is surprisingly complicated to do a simple function. I'll
add to my todo list
to revise apex-env so that it can emit a list of commands to save/restore
the environment
using a shell script.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package:
* beewoolie [2009-09-24 14:17]:
> >[1] See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2009-09/msg00072.html
> Will do. It may take a few days as my development box is offline.
Is your system back or should I do an NMU?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Package: apex-nslu2
Version: 1.6.9
Severity: serious
Debian user Al reported that apex-nslu2 fails to install:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2009/09/msg00027.html
I can confirm this. It's caused by a chance of behaviour in bash that
breaks flash-apex. Since this c
Package: apex-nslu2
Version: 1.6.9
Severity: serious
Debian user Al reported that apex-nslu2 fails to install:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2009/09/msg00027.html
I can confirm this. It's caused by a chance of behaviour in bash that
breaks flash-apex. Since this change was made intentional
6 matches
Mail list logo
