Raphael Geissert escrigué:
Hi everyone,
Could you please test the 5.2.11 packages and check whether it keeps
segfaulting or not?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
It seems like it doesn't segfault anymore, no problems so far. Tested
with Apache2 2.2.13-2 and PHP 5.2.11.dfsg.1-1
Thanks.
Best r
Hi everyone,
Could you please test the 5.2.11 packages and check whether it keeps
segfaulting or not?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Coin,
Quoting Stefan Fritsch :
apache2 2.2.13-1 fixes a php related segfault, too (bug #542623). If
you want to debug/test the php bug, I would recommend that you use
2.2.13 to be sure that you don't hit the apache bug.
Tested php5 5.2.10.dfsg.1-2.2 with apache2 2.2.13-1 still segfault.
Rev
Coin,
Quoting Stefan Fritsch :
apache2 2.2.13-1 fixes a php related segfault, too (bug #542623). If
you want to debug/test the php bug, I would recommend that you use
2.2.13 to be sure that you don't hit the apache bug.
I'd like to help more, but i can't upgrade apache2 because of #541607.
-
Hi,
On Wednesday 26 August 2009, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
> Quoting Ondřej Surý :
> > That's an evil plan how to make more people test php 5.3.0 :)
> >
> :-)
> >
> > But anyway it would be great if you can try 5.3.0-3 from
> > experimental. It needs as much testing as it could get.
>
> My mac
Coin,
Quoting Ondřej Surý :
That's an evil plan how to make more people test php 5.3.0 :)
:-)
But anyway it would be great if you can try 5.3.0-3 from experimental.
It needs as much testing as it could get.
My machine is running testing, and i just installed your newly
uploaded 5.3.0-3.
That's an evil plan how to make more people test php 5.3.0 :)
Well no, in fact, updated packages are in preparation, snippet from other mail:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:41, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> > * The code is far away from being as "stable" as 5.2.x
>>
>> "stable" as in #542514? :) The ide
Coin,
With the patch in #542906, i managed to make a package without the
suhosin patch, and the problem still persist, so i guess this is a bug
in 5.2.10 and not in the suhosin check as i first thought.
Seems 5.2.9.dfsg.1-4 is neither in the archive anymore, nor in
snapshot.debian.net, so
8 matches
Mail list logo
