Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Oh, I just now realized this bug has been reopened... I do think (but
will not single-handedly demote it) the bug's severity has been
inflated - I use hpricot on a frequent basis, and it's far from
"renders the package useless". It does not work, right, but for very
specific u
Julien Cristau dijo [Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:51:26AM +0200]:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 16:28:12 +0100, something...@sodium.serveirc.com
> wrote:
>
> > So it turns out the main bug does not affect amd64 (or more generally,
> > roughly systems where (LONG_MAX>>2) >= INT_MAX).
> >
> > There are at
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 16:28:12 +0100, something...@sodium.serveirc.com wrote:
> So it turns out the main bug does not affect amd64 (or more generally,
> roughly systems where (LONG_MAX>>2) >= INT_MAX).
>
> There are at least two bugs in the tag comparison:
> - Assumes number equality is the sa
So it turns out the main bug does not affect amd64 (or more generally, roughly
systems where (LONG_MAX>>2) >= INT_MAX).
There are at least two bugs in the tag comparison:
- Assumes number equality is the same as VALUE equality.
- Assumes hash equality is the same as string equality.
The first ca
4 matches
Mail list logo
