* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2009-06-27 14:16:14 [+0200]:
>Yup it is. hppa still uses Linuxthreads and has no nptl support as far
>as I can see. If that is that case (what I belive) I would rename
>#445682 to "Please implement nptl on hppa" and kinda depend on it.
Ah. Looks like Carlos O'Donell i
* Uwe Kleine-K?nig | 2009-06-25 14:45:41 [+0200]:
>actually the problem on hppa is quite different. hppa has the _tid
>member, but there are some pthread defines missing.
>
>Reading http://bugs.debian.org/445682 makes me believe that pthreads on
>hppa are not so completely implemented as on other
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:33:12AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2009-06-23 22:15:03 [+0200]:
>
> >one. So killing sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/$ARCH/bits/siginfo.h should fix
> >the problem.
> It raises new ones.
> In case were are going to fix this I'
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2009-06-23 22:15:03 [+0200]:
>one. So killing sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/$ARCH/bits/siginfo.h should fix
>the problem.
It raises new ones.
In case were are going to fix this I've attached two patches:
- sparc fix from 2.10 tree
- s390/ia64 fix which is untested but shoul
package: rt-tests
version: 0.39-2
Severity: serious
The package fails to build on:
- hppa [0]
- ia64 [1]
- s390 [2]
- sparc [3]
This is due to a header mess in glibc: it provides struct sigevent and
its typedef in os dependent bits/siginfo.h rather than using the generic
one. So killing sysdeps/u
5 matches
Mail list logo
