> I was informed that Rafael Laboissiere, the maintainer, is not
> involved in Debian development.
> This package is too import for me to "play with" (since I'm still a
> beginner at packaging). If you know someone that wishes to take over,
> please do!
Typos:
I was informed that Rafael Laboissier
I was informed that Rafael Laboissiere, the maintainer, is not
involved in Debian development.
This package is too import for me to "play with" (since I'm still a
beginner at packaging). If you know someone that wishes to take over,
please do!
Also, it's too risky to include a patch for older debi
CC'ed again with patch :)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 83a327d..bdf6915 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -2,8 +2,13 @@ libmtp (0.3.7-8) unstable; urgency=low
[ Savvas Radevic ]
- * debian/libmtp.postinst.in: Remove broken symlink
-/etc/u
CC'ed the bug report
2009/6/3 Savvas Radevic :
> Sean, thank you, very helpful!
>
> Rafael:
>> That said, i am wondering why the libmtp.rules files should be versioned,
>> as we are doing currently. Perhaps, the 45-libmpt8.rules files would
>> work just fine with previous versions (5, 6, and 7) o
* Savvas Radevic [2009-06-03 12:51]:
> > Rafael, you are right, it probably will. But I'm worried about these:
> > (1) Is the remaining /etc/udev/libmtp.rules (and symlink
> > /etc/udev/rules.d/libmtp.rules) going to affect libmtp8? We'll have to
> > ask upstream I guess.
>
> http://sourceforge.
hi savvas,
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:13:11AM +0200, Savvas Radevic wrote:
> @Sean: thank you for the tip, didn't know that! :)
> Sean, can you reply with the output of:
>
> apt-cache policy libmtp5 libmtp6
libmtp5:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: (none)
Version table:
0.1.5-2 0
> Rafael, you are right, it probably will. But I'm worried about these:
> (1) Is the remaining /etc/udev/libmtp.rules (and symlink
> /etc/udev/rules.d/libmtp.rules) going to affect libmtp8? We'll have to
> ask upstream I guess.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=809062&aid=2800399&gr
@Sean: thank you for the tip, didn't know that! :)
Sean, can you reply with the output of:
apt-cache policy libmtp5 libmtp6
apt-cache rdepends libmtp5 libmtp6
I really need to see where they came from, if they were manually
installed (or from another source) and if any packages depend on it.
Rap
* Raphael Hertzog [2009-06-03 08:54]:
> On Tue, 02 Jun 2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > The libmtp7 package contains the file /etc/udev/rules.d/libmtp7.rules. This
> > file is not touched by libmtp8, AFAIK.
> >
> > On the other hand, libmtp5 seems to be affected by the following offending
> >
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> The libmtp7 package contains the file /etc/udev/rules.d/libmtp7.rules. This
> file is not touched by libmtp8, AFAIK.
>
> On the other hand, libmtp5 seems to be affected by the following offending
> code in postinst:
>
> if dpkg --compare-versio
hiya,
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:49:42PM +0200, Savvas Radevic wrote:
> I think this is related to bug #525094 - the reporter probably has not
> updated to the latest available package:
> libmtp8 0.3.7-7
>
> Sean, is my assumption true?
note sure for the last email whether you still needed this,
2009/6/2 Savvas Radevic :
>
> ..which is removed by debian/libmtp.postinst.in:
> rm -f /etc/udev/libmtp.rules
Correction:
..which is removed by debian/libmtp.preinst.in:
rm -f /etc/udev/libmtp.rules
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
> * Savvas Radevic [2009-06-02 15:51]:
>
>> Ah wait, now I get it. Rafael, is "Breaks" allowed on older libmtp* packages?
>
> No, for the same reason Replaces is not allowed.
>
>> It seems like libmtp5-7 might require the older rules (not in /lib)
>
> The libmtp7 package contains the file /etc/ude
[Cc:ing to the BTS, this time, sorry.]
* Savvas Radevic [2009-06-02 15:51]:
> Ah wait, now I get it. Rafael, is "Breaks" allowed on older libmtp* packages?
No, for the same reason Replaces is not allowed.
> It seems like libmtp5-7 might require the older rules (not in /lib)
The libmtp7 packag
> In sum: never, ever try to implement Conflicts/Replaces as proposed
> above.
Noted! :)
I think this is related to bug #525094 - the reporter probably has not
updated to the latest available package:
libmtp8 0.3.7-7
Sean, is my assumption true?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-req
> I think this is related to bug #525094 - the reporter probably has not
> updated to the latest available package:
> libmtp8 0.3.7-7
>
> Sean, is my assumption true?
>
Ah wait, now I get it. Rafael, is "Breaks" allowed on older libmtp* packages?
It seems like libmtp5-7 might require the older rul
* Savvas Radevic [2009-06-02 12:50]:
> I'm not completely sure, but I think the package is missing
> "Conflicts" and "Replaces" for older libmtp* packages?
>
> Something like:
>
> Conflicts: libmtp7, libmtp6, libmtp5
> Replaces: libmtp7, libmtp6, libmtp5
>
> ..in debian/control.in and debian/c
I'm not completely sure, but I think the package is missing
"Conflicts" and "Replaces" for older libmtp* packages?
Something like:
Conflicts: libmtp7, libmtp6, libmtp5
Replaces: libmtp7, libmtp6, libmtp5
..in debian/control.in and debian/control files.
Thoughts?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
That's quite an old package, I don't see it in the supported releases:
http://packages.debian.org/libmtp5
Can you explain how did this happen?
I can only assume that you upgraded, but from which older release to
which one, using which commands? :)
Also, reply with the output of:
apt-cache policy
19 matches
Mail list logo
