Michael Stone wrote:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Michael Stone wrote:
>>> you wrote:
$: sort -um -o list list work
>>>
>>> I'll look at the segfault, but I'm not sure that was ever guaranteed to give
>>> a useful result (you're overwriting an input file).
>>
>> Yes, it works nicely in stable r
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:36:20PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:43:21PM -0300, you wrote:
$: sort -um -o list list work
I'll look at the segfault, but I'm not sure that was ever guaranteed to give
a useful res
Hello Michael,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:43:21PM -0300, you wrote:
>>
>> $: sort -um -o list list work
>
> I'll look at the segfault, but I'm not sure that was ever guaranteed to give
> a useful result (you're overwriting an input file).
Y
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:43:21PM -0300, you wrote:
$: sort -um -o list list work
I'll look at the segfault, but I'm not sure that was ever guaranteed to
give a useful result (you're overwriting an input file).
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.or
Package: coreutils
Version: 7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Hello,
While updating d-i kernel I've found a regression in sort, against
stable.
$: sort -um -o list list work
The files are attached to easy the reproducability.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers uns
5 matches
Mail list logo