Bug#525048: sort: sefaults

2009-04-21 Thread Bob Proulx
Michael Stone wrote: > Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Michael Stone wrote: >>> you wrote: $: sort -um -o list list work >>> >>> I'll look at the segfault, but I'm not sure that was ever guaranteed to give >>> a useful result (you're overwriting an input file). >> >> Yes, it works nicely in stable r

Bug#525048: sort: sefaults

2009-04-21 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:36:20PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Michael Stone wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:43:21PM -0300, you wrote: $: sort -um -o list list work I'll look at the segfault, but I'm not sure that was ever guaranteed to give a useful res

Bug#525048: sort: sefaults

2009-04-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Michael, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:43:21PM -0300, you wrote: >> >> $: sort -um -o list list work > > I'll look at the segfault, but I'm not sure that was ever guaranteed to give > a useful result (you're overwriting an input file). Y

Bug#525048: sort: sefaults

2009-04-21 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:43:21PM -0300, you wrote: $: sort -um -o list list work I'll look at the segfault, but I'm not sure that was ever guaranteed to give a useful result (you're overwriting an input file). Mike Stone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.or

Bug#525048: sort: sefaults

2009-04-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
Package: coreutils Version: 7.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: d-i Hello, While updating d-i kernel I've found a regression in sort, against stable. $: sort -um -o list list work The files are attached to easy the reproducability. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers uns