Bug#520338: Resolution

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 22 avril 2009, vers 21:46, Tristan Seligmann disait : >> Therefore 3.6.12 should be fine.  Maybe, we could conflict with previous >> version of sqlite? >>  libsqlite3-0 (<< 3.6) | libsqlite3-0 (>= 3.6.12) > This is rather awkward. I've added a Conflicts: lib

Bug#520338: Resolution

2009-04-22 Thread Tristan Seligmann
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > Therefore 3.6.12 should be fine.  Maybe, we could conflict with previous > version of sqlite? >  libsqlite3-0 (<< 3.6) | libsqlite3-0 (>= 3.6.12) This is rather awkward. I've added a Conflicts: libsqlite3-0 (< 3.6.12) in SVN; I'm not sure I

Bug#520338: Resolution

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du jeudi 16 avril 2009, vers 15:58, Tristan Seligmann disait : > It looks like the sqlite3 change that introduced these issues was > reverted in a later version; INDEXED is no longer a keyword. Thus, a > bumped dependency should take care of this proble

Bug#520338: Resolution

2009-04-16 Thread Tristan Seligmann
It looks like the sqlite3 change that introduced these issues was reverted in a later version; INDEXED is no longer a keyword. Thus, a bumped dependency should take care of this problem; I'll try to track down exactly what version is required later today, and get a fixed version uploaded ASAP. --