Ari Pollak wrote:
> Read my earlier message. There is no minimum kernel requirement of
> 2.6.27 or higher for squeeze, and you can't just declare a kernel
> dependency and hope the user isn't running a lower kernel version.
You're right, but if this bug apparently only affects older kernels, it
sh
I managed to get 1.3 working with 2.6.26; all I did was
removing the SOCK_CLOEXEC stuff and rebuild in a
pure lenny system.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
(forgot to send this reply to the bug)
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 22:03 +, Rob Andrews wrote:
> Given this situation, I'm wondering what worth there is implementing a fix
> if it's already obsolete before the package is pushed out.
Because there's no dependency on kernel >= 2.6.27, and there's not
On 18-Mar-2009 00:26.08 (GMT), Ari Pollak wrote:
> nspluginwrapper currently does not work at all on my system; I believe
> this has to do with a kernel 2.6.27-specific flag passed to socket()
> now, but I'm not entirely sure. This is especially bad given that the
> default kernel in both squee
Package: nspluginwrapper
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: serious
nspluginwrapper currently does not work at all on my system; I believe
this has to do with a kernel 2.6.27-specific flag passed to socket()
now, but I'm not entirely sure. This is especially bad given that the
default kernel in both squee
5 matches
Mail list logo
