* Luis Mondesi [Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:56:22 -0400]:
> Splashy has not been tested against newer version of libdirectfb. I know for
> sure that libdirectfb 1.2 makes it segfault.
> We will need to work on the transition anyway. I just have not have time
> lately to work on this. Maybe this summer.
> This is a bit complicated. We will work on it.
I’m curious. Why is it complicated?
Thanks,
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
Splashy has not been tested against newer version of libdirectfb. I know for
sure that libdirectfb 1.2 makes it segfault.
We will need to work on the transition anyway. I just have not have time
lately to work on this. Maybe this summer.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >
This is a bit complicated. We will work on it.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Package: splashy
> Version: 0.3.13-3
> Severity: serious
>
> I guess it’s time to drop the hard coded dependency on libdirectfb-1.0-0.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> - Are you sure we're good?
> - Alway
Package: splashy
Version: 0.3.13-3
Severity: serious
I guess it’s time to drop the hard coded dependency on libdirectfb-1.0-0.
Thanks,
--
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
-- Rory and Lorelai
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
5 matches
Mail list logo