On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 05:44:44PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Bastian Blank ha scritto:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:58:44PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> >> you merged devmapper source, but it had an epoch:
> > Please explain. Which version have a bad epoch.
> When comparing two versi
Bastian Blank ha scritto:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:58:44PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
>> you merged devmapper source, but it had an epoch:
>
> Please explain. Which version have a bad epoch.
When comparing two version numbers, first the epoch of each are compared, so
2.02.44-2 < 2:1.02.3
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:58:44PM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> you merged devmapper source, but it had an epoch:
Please explain. Which version have a bad epoch.
Bastian
--
Ahead warp factor one, Mr. Sulu.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.44-2
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
you merged devmapper source, but it had an epoch:
# dpkg --compare-versions 2.02.44-2 gt 2:1.02.30-2; echo $?
1
# rmadison -s unstable dmsetup
dmsetup | 2:1.02.27-4 | unstable | arm
4 matches
Mail list logo