Bug#513022: Possible security flaw in ad-hoc probe request processing

2009-01-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 09:17:26AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:26:56AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This ought to be fixable by a binNMU, but linux-modules-contrib-2.6 is > > not binNMU-safe. And rebuilding it properly in unstable will add new > > binary packages fo

Bug#513022: Possible security flaw in ad-hoc probe request processing

2009-01-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:26:56AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This ought to be fixable by a binNMU, but linux-modules-contrib-2.6 is > not binNMU-safe. And rebuilding it properly in unstable will add new > binary packages for the vserver flavour. Perhaps a testing-security > upload is in order

Bug#513022: Possible security flaw in ad-hoc probe request processing

2009-01-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
This ought to be fixable by a binNMU, but linux-modules-contrib-2.6 is not binNMU-safe. And rebuilding it properly in unstable will add new binary packages for the vserver flavour. Perhaps a testing-security upload is in order. I did at least find the magic runes to add a build-dependency on the