Hi,
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:02:41 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008 à 09:19 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit :
> > > But after I upgraded librsvg2-2 to the version from exp (2.22.3-1),
> > > everything is fine.
> >
> > Josselin and GNOME people,do you know something ab
Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008 à 09:19 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit :
> > But after I upgraded librsvg2-2 to the version from exp (2.22.3-1),
> > everything is fine.
>
> Josselin and GNOME people,do you know something about this (#508443), please?
> Do you agree if I reassign it to librsvg?
I’
Hi Evgeni!
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:36:12 -0200 Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
>> Are you also able to test it with imagemagick from experimental
>> (7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1), please?
>
> Funny,
> upgrading IM to the version from exp did not help, se
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:36:12 -0200 Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Are you also able to test it with imagemagick from experimental
> (7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1), please?
Funny,
upgrading IM to the version from exp did not help, see attached traces
(no IM debug symbols, sorry, no time to recompile that bie
Hi Evgeni!
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:46:52 +0100
Evgeni Golov wrote:
> I've a sparc running 2.6.23 (cant go to >= 2.6.24 due to other bugs)
> and I can reproduce this bug. Attached you find a "bt full", but it
> does not look very helpfull, can it be that the problem is in librsvg,
> not in imagema
Hey,
I've a sparc running 2.6.23 (cant go to >= 2.6.24 due to other bugs)
and I can reproduce this bug. Attached you find a "bt full", but it
does not look very helpfull, can it be that the problem is in librsvg,
not in imagemagick? I also add a trace with -debug all,trace and the
output of identi
6 matches
Mail list logo
