Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote: > > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: >> > >> > Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable >> > for eclipse afaict. >> > The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: > > > > Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable > > for eclipse afaict. > > The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license. > > Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecat

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: > > > > Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable > > for eclipse afaict. > > The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license. > > Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be depreca

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-04-30 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
> > Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable > for eclipse afaict. > The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license. > Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at least for eclipse). > Also, make sure you have installed xulrunner-dev or

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-04-30 Thread Pantelis Koukousoulas
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote: > severity 507536 serious > thanks > > > pure unstable/amd64 system here. I just installed eclipse to test something > and I > got this problem too. > > When starting eclipse from command line i got: > > a...@pryan:$ eclipse > searching for co