Bug#507059: Why does this break initramfs-tools

2008-12-14 Thread Julien Danjou
At 1229205113 time_t, Sam Hartman wrote: > A version of udev greater than the one that initramfs-tools depends on fails > to include this command? The version in etch does not have it and satisfy the deps AFAIK. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `

Bug#507059: Why does this break initramfs-tools

2008-12-13 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Julien" == Julien Danjou writes: Julien> At 1229197265 time_t, Sam Hartman wrote: >> How is this actually breaking things annd making the package >> unusuable? Julien> Some version of udev does not have the udevadm command. Julien> So even with udev, this fails. A ver

Bug#507059: Why does this break initramfs-tools

2008-12-13 Thread Julien Danjou
At 1229197265 time_t, Sam Hartman wrote: > How is this actually breaking things annd making the package > unusuable? Some version of udev does not have the udevadm command. So even with udev, this fails. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' htt

Bug#507059: Why does this break initramfs-tools

2008-12-13 Thread Sam Hartman
So, as I understand it, the current initramfs-tools uses udev if it is not installed and doesn't use udev if it is installed. At least in the case of waiting for udev to settle. However, initramfs-tools depends on udev. So, the effect of this bug seems to be that you don't wait for udev to settl