On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 05:21:03PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Basically, I really don't know how etch -> lenny upgrades will behave.
>
> The 'splashy' package doesn't exist in etch; so if this is an issue only on
> upgrade, it should probably be downgraded.
Hmh, yeah, good point there. But
> Basically, I really don't know how etch -> lenny upgrades will behave.
The 'splashy' package doesn't exist in etch; so if this is an issue only on
upgrade, it should probably be downgraded.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
I see... messy problem :-), ok let's wait until splashy situation is
stabilized. Thanks for you quick answer!
Regards,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:52:32AM +0100, Daniel Campos wrote:
> I see... messy problem :-), ok let's wait until splashy situation is
> stabilized. Thanks for you quick answer!
I'm not sure the splashy situation will stabilize. They seem to be happy
with the current situation, and there was 2 RC b
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 08:43:35PM +0100, Daniel Campos wrote:
> If Splashy package is installed but /etc/splashy/config.xml doesn't exist,
> package installation fails at postinstallation time. The "debian/postinst"
> file
> of desktop-base package contains the following code:
>
> if [ -x /sbin/
Package: desktop-base
Version: 5.0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
If Splashy package is installed but /etc/splashy/config.xml doesn't exist,
package installation fails at postinstallation time. The "debian/postinst" file
of desktop-base package contains the following cod
6 matches
Mail list logo
