Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the proper solution to #429059 is to remove the
> avoid-fakemail-mail-loss.diff completely and change the default of
> mail-interactive to t. These days there are simply too many systems
> where the MTA is configured for local delivery only, or n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 502762 emacs22
Bug#502762: mailcrypt: piuparts test fails: emacs-install error
Bug reassigned from package `mailcrypt' to `emacs22'.
> reassign 429059 emacs22
Bug#429059: emacs22-el: error message in sendmail.el stops loading gnus when
not us
Really attaching patch now.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:25:45AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> That is the same problem as in #502762, triggered by a Debian-specific
> patch that lets sendmail.el throw an error if neither sendmail nor
> /usr/bin/mail can be found, first reported and discussed in #42
reassign 502762 emacs22
reassign 429059 emacs22
forcemerge 502762 429059
found 502762 22.0.99+1-1
tag 502762 +patch
thanks
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 08:25:45AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> That is the same problem as in #502762, triggered by a Debian-specific
> patch that lets sendmail.el throw an e
MJ> On Sat Oct 25 08:25, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> That is the same problem as in #502762, triggered by a
>> Debian-specific patch that lets sendmail.el throw an error if neither
>> sendmail nor /usr/bin/mail can be found, first reported and discussed
>> in #429059. Since a sensible solution had alr
On Sat Oct 25 08:25, Sven Joachim wrote:
> The relevant message in that file seems to be this one:
>
> > In toplevel form:
> > silly-mail.el:86:1:Error: /usr/bin/mail is not executable
>
> That is the same problem as in #502762, triggered by a Debian-specific
> patch that lets sendmail.el throw a
6 matches
Mail list logo
