On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 06:50:10PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> Why are we trying to guess the future here ? We want something working for
> lenny now and we'll fix that for squeeze when it has been merged upstream.
>
> [...]
>
> I propose to not use Thomas patch but to remove the code that
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 07:45:09PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > Please find the patch attached. It works here at least.
> >
> > I'm happy with it too since it works in domU (no change).
>
> Several days passed and I saw no reaction from the mainta
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Please find the patch attached. It works here at least.
>
> I'm happy with it too since it works in domU (no change).
Several days passed and I saw no reaction from the maintainers.
Robert, can you apply the patch and upload a fixed package to get rid
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 18:50 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> tag 500336 + patch
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > What's the reasoning behind this loop ? All the suitable kernels are
> > > already selected
> > > by the first loot that matches CONFIG_XEN + CONFIG_XEN_PRIVI
tag 500336 + patch
thanks
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > What's the reasoning behind this loop ? All the suitable kernels are
> > already selected
> > by the first loot that matches CONFIG_XEN + CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST.
> >
> > Can't we simply drop this loop and be done with it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 500336 + patch
Bug#500336: grub - Misguides Xen images
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 16:45 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > This means that if I am running a pv ops kernel and I install a
> > non-pvops kernel for whatever reason then my menu.lst will omit it.
>
> Sure.
>
> Let's come back to the root of this bug r
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> This means that if I am running a pv ops kernel and I install a
> non-pvops kernel for whatever reason then my menu.lst will omit it.
Sure.
Let's come back to the root of this bug report, the problem is that
2.6.26-1-686-bigmem has CONFIG_XEN and CONFIG
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 10:57 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > So the problem would bite people upgrading grub but not the kernel.
> > > >
> > > > Someone who installs 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 in a Lenny domU with the Lenny
> > > > version of grub would en
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > So the problem would bite people upgrading grub but not the kernel.
> > >
> > > Someone who installs 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 in a Lenny domU with the Lenny
> > > version of grub would end up with a menu.lst which did not contain this
> > > kernel, which
tags 500336 - patch
# still being discussed
thanks
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:56:01PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> I wonder if we have a reliable way to know that the target system
> is a domU when we install it with d-i. After all, from what I understand
> that's the main problem to solve t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 500336 - patch
Bug#500336: grub - Misguides Xen images
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> # still being discussed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 17:56 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we need to decide on a fix for this RC bug and get a new grub uploaded.
> So lets restart the discussion.
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 21:18 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
Hi,
we need to decide on a fix for this RC bug and get a new grub uploaded.
So lets restart the discussion.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 21:18 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > My only concern would be the behaviour when r
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 21:18 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ian Campbell wrote:
> > My only concern would be the behaviour when running in a domU. I haven't
> > looked very closely at the patch yet but a comment says
> > +# CONFIG_XEN + NO CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> > +# --> domU capable, b
Hi,
Ian Campbell wrote:
> My only concern would be the behaviour when running in a domU. I haven't
> looked very closely at the patch yet but a comment says
> +# CONFIG_XEN + NO CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> +# --> domU capable, but must not show up in grub
>
> which sounds like menu.lst in a guest d
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 08:52 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:40:07PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > based on Bastian's comments here and a clarification on IRC (thanks!), I
> > would like to propose the attached patch.
>
> I understand that Bastian knows wha
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:40:07PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> based on Bastian's comments here and a clarification on IRC (thanks!), I
> would like to propose the attached patch.
I understand that Bastian knows what he's doing, but nevertheless I'd like
this to be okayed by Ian (CCed
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:40:07PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> based on Bastian's comments here and a clarification on IRC (thanks!), I
> would like to propose the attached patch.
Looks okay.
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Hi,
based on Bastian's comments here and a clarification on IRC (thanks!), I
would like to propose the attached patch.
It implements the following behaviour
CONFIG_XEN + CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST
--> added to xen0Kernels
CONFIG_XEN + CONFIG_PARAVIRT
--> kept in kernel list
CONFIG_XEN + no CONF
20 matches
Mail list logo
