Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto wrote:
> You are right, wath dou you recommend, a possible solution, could be:
> - remove it from lenny,
[..]
> - and finally get this one into the new debian version
>
> I think it could be a good solutions, what do you propose
Yes, excellent. I'll just send a mail to
Hi
> > I going to repackage this module for fix the licenses problem in this
> > version to try to get it into lenny
>
> Whilst that is admirable, even if you do this it will not work with source
> code for lenny's version of Python..
>
You are right, wath dou you recommend, a possible solution, c
Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto wrote:
> I going to repackage this module for fix the licenses problem in this
> version to try to get it into lenny
Whilst that is admirable, even if you do this it will not work with source
code for lenny's version of Python..
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK
> However, the version in testing is unfit for release, so at the very minimum
> it has to be removed from lenny.
I going to repackage this module for fix the licenses problem in this
version to try to get it into lenny
> Carlos, let's assume you're the maintainer - how does just removing it from
Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto wrote:
> I have done an ITA to happydoc and write an email to happydoc
> upstreamer for getting been happydoc commiter to solve this module
> problem and get this package development continues.
That's good to hear.
However, the version in testing is unfit for release,
HI
> I plan to remove python-happydoc which was orphaned in April. For the
> rationale and a short discussion with upstream, please see the (RC) bug:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/497703
>
> Any objections?
I have done an ITA to happydoc and write an email to happydoc
upstreamer for getting been ha
HI
> I plan to remove python-happydoc which was orphaned in April. For the
> rationale and a short discussion with upstream, please see the (RC) bug:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/497703
>
> Any objections?
I have done an ITA to happydoc and write an email to happydoc
upstreamer for getting been ha
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi debian-qa,
>
> I plan to remove python-happydoc which was orphaned in April. For the
> rationale and a short discussion with upstream, please see the (RC) bug:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/497703
>
> Any objections?
>
>
> Regards,
>
+1 from me. Go ahead.. it has many
Hi debian-qa,
I plan to remove python-happydoc which was orphaned in April. For the
rationale and a short discussion with upstream, please see the (RC) bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/497703
Any objections?
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
9 matches
Mail list logo
