Luk Claes writes ("Bug#490764: adns-tools should provide compatibility"):
> I don't intend to finger-point anyone, I just disagree that it's an RC
> bug and you're just challenging my authority...
I'm terribly sorry if trying to convince you to change your mind
ly we can avoid
> having this turn into some hideous finger-pointing exercise.
I don't intend to finger-point anyone, I just disagree that it's an RC
bug and you're just challenging my authority...
> Secondly, the hideous finger-pointing exercise:
>
> Luk Claes writes (&
Robert Edmonds writes ("Bug#490764: Bug#492145: Bug#490764: adns-tools should
provide compatibility"):
> please NMU if necessary. i am completely tied up with (other) dns
> issues right now.
Right, willdo, thank you.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 492145 important
Bug#492145: adns-tools should provide compatibility
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Ian Jackson wrote:
> I would like ideally to improve both packages. So with the
> adns maintainer's and release managers' permission I would like to
> push a new version of adns which also `Provides: libadns1-bin'.
please NMU if necessary. i am completely tied up with (other) dns
issues right no
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:20:21PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> severity 492145 minor
> severity 490746 serious
Surely the right answer is for both bugs to be serious until the
maintainers agree?
> That's not RC at all as only a few packages are involved and easy
> backporting is not required. It wo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 490764 serious
Bug#490764: libadns1-bin has been renamed
Severity set to `serious' from `minor'
> severity 492145 serious
Bug#492145: adns-tools should provide compatibility
Severity set to `serious' from `minor'
> thanks
Stopping processing
severity 492145 minor
severity 490746 serious
thanks
Ian Jackson wrote:
> clone 490764 -1
> reassign -1 adns
> retitle -1 adns-tools should provide compatibility
> severity 490764 minor
> retitle 490764 libadns1-bin has been renamed
> thanks
>
> As I have just said on debian-devel, I think that t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 492145 minor
Bug#492145: adns-tools should provide compatibility
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
> severity 490746 serious
Bug#490746: It FTBFS with gcc 4.3 in i386 arch
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping proces
clone 490764 -1
reassign -1 adns
retitle -1 adns-tools should provide compatibility
severity 490764 minor
retitle 490764 libadns1-bin has been renamed
thanks
As I have just said on debian-devel, I think that the release-critical
bug here is that adns-tools should Provide: libadns1-bin but does
n
10 matches
Mail list logo
