Bug#488924: dspam-webfrontend and apache2-suexec

2008-09-02 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Sorry this answer took so long. First the usual disclaimer: I am not a release team member. On Sunday 17 August 2008, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote: > > Lenny is frozen, the release team will never accept so many > > changes to go into Lenny. > I understand your feeling about this. However, I think you

Bug#488924: dspam-webfrontend and apache2-suexec

2008-08-17 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
On Fri, Aug 15 2008, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Lenny is frozen, the release team will never accept so many changes to > go into Lenny. This means there are two ways forward: > > - Downgrade #488924 to non-RC severity, stay with 3.6.8-8.1 in Lenny, > go ahead with your upload that changes lots of t

Bug#488924: [Pkg-dspam-misc] Bug#488924: dspam-webfrontend and apache2-suexec

2008-08-15 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Thursday 14 August 2008, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13 2008, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > dspam-webfrontend does not depend on apache2, it just suggests it > > (via mod-perl). It should also suggest apache2-suexec. Will there > > be an upload soon or should I do a NMU? > > I'm moving to a

Bug#488924: [Pkg-dspam-misc] Bug#488924: dspam-webfrontend and apache2-suexec

2008-08-14 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
On Wed, Aug 13 2008, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > dspam-webfrontend does not depend on apache2, it just suggests it (via > mod-perl). It should also suggest apache2-suexec. Will there be an > upload soon or should I do a NMU? I'm moving to a dependency on apache2-suexec. Is there a problem with doi

Bug#488924: dspam-webfrontend and apache2-suexec

2008-08-13 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote: > tags 488924 + pending > thanks > > The reversion in apache2 is going into testing today (2.2.9-5), so > the UID issue is gone. > > However, we need to add apache2-suexec as a dependency for > dspam-webfrontend. dspam-webfrontend does not depend o